Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box
#1
Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here.

After a few runs on B200, I ended up with decent performance, but the setup only really made sense once I adjusted around tokens/sec.

Nothing scientific here, just practical notes from a real setup. At this point the real bottleneck is my patience.
Reply
#2
Did a small comparison this afternoon. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher.
Reply
#3
Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on GB200. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Reply
#4
Quote:Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on GB200. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow f

Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on mini PC.
Reply
#5
I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at router policy. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#6
Quote:I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at router policy. Not glamo

Good point. That matches what I saw on 5090. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
small models can still be good
Reply
#7
A couple questions before I guess too hard. Are you testing this on A6000 or something else?
still benchmarking everything
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)