![]() |
|
latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Optimization & Performance (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Performance Tuning (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +--- Thread: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box (/showthread.php?tid=93) |
latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - tensorport - 09-01-2026 Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here. After a few runs on B200, I ended up with decent performance, but the setup only really made sense once I adjusted around tokens/sec. Nothing scientific here, just practical notes from a real setup. At this point the real bottleneck is my patience. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - tensorfield88 - 09-01-2026 Did a small comparison this afternoon. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - signalcraft14 - 09-02-2026 Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on GB200. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - sparrowshed - 09-02-2026 Quote:Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on GB200. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow f Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on mini PC. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - turboscope5 - 09-02-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at router policy. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - kernelrunner - 09-03-2026 Quote:I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at router policy. Not glamo Good point. That matches what I saw on 5090. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: latency vs throughput for small deployments on Threadripper box - localpatch - 09-03-2026 A couple questions before I guess too hard. Are you testing this on A6000 or something else? |