Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion on 4090
#1
Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.

If you were starting from scratch today for this use case, what would you choose first and what would you ignore?

I'm especially interested in mistakes worth avoiding.
still benchmarking everything
Reply
#2
Quote:Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.

Not sure I agree there. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#3
Tried to reproduce it just now. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#4
I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at reranking. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.

If you post your exact settings, people here can probably narrow it down pretty fast.
context windows are not a product strategy
Reply
#5
Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on B200. I keep promising myself this is the last rebuild.
learning in public
Reply
#6
Thanks, that helps. The pattern around VRAM headroom has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
rack in the garage • local models everywhere
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)