Posts: 73
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.
I'm helping a small team set up a local workflow. We don't need a giant stack, but we do care about prefill/decode split.
Simple and boring is a valid answer.
Posts: 33
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on GB200. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
Posts: 31
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: On mini PC, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Thanks, that helps. I ended up in about the same place using PyTorch.
Posts: 28
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model.
Posts: 47
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. The pattern around workstation thermals has been pretty similar for me.
Posts: 36
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
that fixed it for me too.
Posts: 63
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: If you're on TensorRT-LLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious.
Posts: 34
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Can you fill in a bit more context? Are you testing this on dual 3090 or something else?
Posts: 20
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Quote:Can you fill in a bit more context? Are you testing this on dual 3090 or something else?
I'd start with the simpler stack.
still benchmarking everything