Posts: 40
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Spent some time on this today and wanted to compare notes.
I'm comparing two approaches here: keep it simple on M3 Max, or squeeze more out of the stack and deal with the complexity.
Trying to avoid rebuilding the whole thing twice. The logs were somehow calmer than I was.
trying not to rebuild again
Posts: 80
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at prefix caching. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.
Posts: 40
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Tried to reproduce it just now. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher.
trying not to rebuild again
Posts: 39
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Did a small comparison this afternoon. On Threadripper box with PyTorch, I saw basically the same behavior. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.
Posts: 62
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at router policy. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
Posts: 27
Threads: 1
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I've seen people blame INT4 when the real issue was much more mundane. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup.
learning in public
Posts: 38
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
worth checking the driver first.
Posts: 142
Threads: 20
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Phi and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
small models can still be useful