Posts: 41
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd approach it in a boring order. On GB200, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.
Posts: 34
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at batch size. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
small models can still be good
Posts: 52
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
A couple things I'd check first. If you're on Ollama, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Posts: 25
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at structured output. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Posts: 38
Threads: 8
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Need a little more detail here. Are you testing this on 4090 or something else?
Posts: 211
Threads: 21
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet.
7900 XTX / ROCm / somehow still optimistic