Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
continuous batching wins and losses
#11
Appreciate the detail. The pattern around tail latency has been pretty similar for me. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
queue depth watcher
Reply
#12
Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#13
Can you fill in a bit more context? Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally?
Reply
#14
Need a little more detail here. Are you testing this on 7900 XTX or something else?
learning in public
Reply
#15
Quote:Need a little more detail here. Are you testing this on 7900 XTX or something else?

Maybe, but I had the opposite result. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)