Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MCP server discovery mess on GB200
#1
Wanted to compare notes with people doing similar things.

My current setup is PyTorch with B200, and I keep running into workstation thermals.

Would appreciate practical advice rather than theory.

The part that surprised me was how much the boring details mattered more than the model choice. At this point the real bottleneck is my patience.
mostly local
Reply
#2
I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on vLLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Reply
#3
A couple questions before I guess too hard. What model, what runtime, and roughly what context size?
Reply
#4
subscribed, curious where this lands.
Reply
#5
Quote:subscribed, curious where this lands.

I tested this tonight. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.
Reply
#6
Quote:
Quote:subscribed, curious where this lands.

Good point. I ended up in about the same place using PyTorch. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.

There are a few different conversations hiding inside this thread, so being explicit about the goal helps.
Apple Silicon • MLX mostly
Reply
#7
Good point. The pattern around structured output has been pretty similar for me.
post logs or it didn't happen
Reply
#8
Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#9
Quote:Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Coul

Appreciate the detail. The pattern around workstation thermals has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
Reply
#10
that fixed it for me too.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)