Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AWQ vs GPTQ vs GGUF right now
#11
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I get why that seems right, but on 5090 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup.
Reply
#12
Quote:I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I get why that seems right, but on 5090 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I

My first guess would be this: If you're on Ollama, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.

There are a few different conversations hiding inside this thread, so being explicit about the goal helps.
learning in public
Reply
#13
I hit almost the same issue last night.
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
Reply
#14
Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
Reply
#15
My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Phi and compare from there.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)