Posts: 24
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
I'm trying to sanity-check my setup.
I'm mostly working with Qwen in TensorRT-LLM on A6000. The part I'm trying to understand is speculative decoding.
Would appreciate practical advice rather than theory.
Posts: 51
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. That matches what I saw on GB200. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
serving stack tinkerer
Posts: 121
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Quote:Good point. That matches what I saw on GB200. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look c
I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on TensorRT-LLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
image models by night, local pipelines by day
Posts: 35
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
What exact setup are you running? Are you testing this on dual 3090 or something else?
I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
trying not to rebuild again
Posts: 41
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
That matches what I was seeing. I don't think your conclusion is far off. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
Posts: 43
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Can you fill in a bit more context? What model, what runtime, and roughly what context size?
learning in public
Posts: 31
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. That matches what I saw on Threadripper box. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Posts: 59
Threads: 7
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
I hit almost the same issue last night.
learning in public
Posts: 53
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one.