Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
eval setup for local models: setup advice
#1
Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.

I'm helping a small team set up a local workflow. We don't need a giant stack, but we do care about tool calling.

Would rather learn from your scars than collect my own all at once.

I care more about stability than squeezing the last possible tokens/sec out of it.

I expected the biggest difference to come from the model, but the stack around it mattered at least as much.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#2
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on dual 3090. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
Reply
#3
Can you fill in a bit more context? What model, what runtime, and roughly what context size?
measure twice, benchmark three times
Reply
#4
Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
Reply
#5
A couple things I'd check first. If you're on Ollama, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.
Reply
#6
Thanks, that helps. The pattern around prefill/decode split has been pretty similar for me.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#7
that fixed it for me too.
still benchmarking everything
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)