Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
speculative decoding in llama.cpp
#11
Need a little more detail here. Are you testing this on A6000 or something else? Turns out 'just one more test' was a lie.
Reply
#12
A couple questions before I guess too hard. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
Reply
#13
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I get why that seems right, but on A6000 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one.
Reply
#14
That matches what I was seeing. The pattern around prefill/decode split has been pretty similar for me. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)