10-09-2026, 06:46 AM
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using SGLang. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
|
when RAG was overkill on 5090
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by northgarden37 - 10-09-2026, 03:17 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by bytesupply76 - 10-09-2026, 03:39 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by cacheplane98 - 10-09-2026, 04:37 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by rasterpoint - 10-09-2026, 06:46 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by cozywire - 10-12-2026, 08:16 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by cozysmith - 10-09-2026, 03:19 PM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by sanescope - 10-09-2026, 03:51 PM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by dockridge - 10-09-2026, 05:03 PM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by paperport64 - 10-11-2026, 05:13 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by circuitwire58 - 10-11-2026, 06:19 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by kernelghost - 10-12-2026, 07:02 AM
Re: when RAG was overkill on 5090 - by vrambandit - 10-12-2026, 07:19 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)