10-14-2026, 02:12 PM
Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. At this point the real bottleneck is my patience.
|
LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by fusedhall - 10-08-2026, 09:30 AM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by prompttinker44 - 10-08-2026, 10:07 PM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by vectorember - 10-09-2026, 10:53 AM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by oxidemixer - 10-09-2026, 11:52 AM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by vectorcrate98 - 10-11-2026, 12:27 AM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by orbitbench6 - 10-11-2026, 12:49 AM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by mellowwire98 - 10-11-2026, 01:39 PM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by vectorhouse71 - 10-14-2026, 02:12 PM
Re: LM Studio surprisingly handy: anyone testing this? - by ggufwire22 - 10-15-2026, 02:53 PM
|