10-06-2026, 11:42 PM
I tested this tonight. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality.
|
rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by vectorcrate98 - 10-06-2026, 09:31 AM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by batchyard - 10-06-2026, 11:15 AM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by tensorworks - 10-06-2026, 11:42 PM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by cacheline - 10-07-2026, 09:10 AM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by batchyard - 10-07-2026, 08:33 AM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by edgequill - 10-07-2026, 11:34 AM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by northquill - 10-07-2026, 01:57 PM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by stackpilot - 10-10-2026, 01:59 PM
Re: rackmount vs tower for homelab inference with llama.cpp - by llmpeak - 10-11-2026, 02:04 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)