09-17-2026, 03:48 AM
Appreciate the detail. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-13-2026, 12:06 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by torchshed - 09-13-2026, 02:48 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-14-2026, 03:22 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchsize - 09-14-2026, 09:27 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by amberhall - 09-14-2026, 05:31 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by cudapoint - 09-14-2026, 05:58 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchwire - 09-17-2026, 02:46 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by sanevault - 09-14-2026, 05:02 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by paperport64 - 09-14-2026, 08:13 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by vrambandit - 09-15-2026, 06:00 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-15-2026, 02:28 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by signaltrack44 - 09-17-2026, 03:48 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by rocmriley - 09-17-2026, 08:05 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)