Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants
#8
Good point. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply


Messages In This Thread
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-13-2026, 12:06 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by torchshed - 09-13-2026, 02:48 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-14-2026, 03:22 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchsize - 09-14-2026, 09:27 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by amberhall - 09-14-2026, 05:31 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by cudapoint - 09-14-2026, 05:58 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchwire - 09-17-2026, 02:46 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by sanevault - 09-14-2026, 05:02 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by paperport64 - 09-14-2026, 08:13 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by vrambandit - 09-15-2026, 06:00 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by thetarunner - 09-15-2026, 02:28 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by rocmriley - 09-17-2026, 08:05 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)