Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
prefix caching in llama.cpp
#4
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on GB200. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
Reply


Messages In This Thread
prefix caching in llama.cpp - by vectorport - 10-17-2026, 02:04 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by embershed99 - 10-18-2026, 02:04 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by embershed99 - 10-18-2026, 07:39 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by bytesupply76 - 10-19-2026, 01:18 AM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by vrambandit - 10-18-2026, 05:41 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by kernelrunner - 10-18-2026, 06:23 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by thetagrid15 - 10-18-2026, 11:07 PM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by northgrid33 - 10-19-2026, 12:43 AM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by northcraft90 - 10-19-2026, 01:32 AM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by vrambandit - 10-19-2026, 02:26 AM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by mellowwire98 - 10-19-2026, 03:18 AM
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - by latentcraft - 10-19-2026, 04:03 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)