10-17-2026, 02:02 PM
A couple things I'd check first. If you're on vLLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchwire - 10-16-2026, 02:20 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by cudapoint - 10-16-2026, 03:41 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by fastscope - 10-17-2026, 02:02 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by rocmriley - 10-17-2026, 03:53 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by turbogrid11 - 10-17-2026, 09:49 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by signaltrack44 - 10-17-2026, 08:34 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by turbogrid11 - 10-17-2026, 10:40 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by southspark - 10-18-2026, 11:05 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by rocmriley - 10-18-2026, 11:45 PM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchshed - 10-19-2026, 01:15 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by signaltrack44 - 10-19-2026, 02:46 AM
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants - by batchwire - 10-19-2026, 05:43 AM
|