Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
quant support gaps: what are you seeing?
#5
Quote:Can you fill in a bit more context? Are you testing this on 5090 or something else?

My first guess would be this: If you're on llama.cpp, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. The logs were somehow calmer than I was.
Mostly CUDA, sometimes wrong, usually measured
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: quant support gaps: what are you seeing? - by kernelmike - 10-19-2026, 01:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)