Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
video model setup pain points with TensorRT-LLM
#1
Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.

If you were starting from scratch today for this use case, what would you choose first and what would you ignore?

Simple and boring is a valid answer.

I care more about stability than squeezing the last possible tokens/sec out of it. The logs were somehow calmer than I was.
Reply
#2
What worked for me was pretty simple. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at token cost.
Reply
#3
I tested this tonight. On mini PC with Ollama, I saw basically the same behavior.
Reply
#4
I tested this tonight. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.

I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
serving stack tinkerer
Reply
#5
Good point. That matches what I saw on dual 3090. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Reply
#6
Quote:Good point. That matches what I saw on dual 3090. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt

My first guess would be this: Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at HBM constraints. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.

I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#7
Ran a quick check on my box. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.
local image tinkerer
Reply
#8
I tested this tonight. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher.
post logs or it didn't happen
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)