Posts: 37
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time.
I'm helping a small team set up a local workflow. We don't need a giant stack, but we do care about embeddings.
I'm especially interested in mistakes worth avoiding.
Posts: 47
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
A couple things I'd check first. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at token cost.
Posts: 50
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
worth checking the driver first.
Posts: 36
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: On 5090, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives.
Posts: 142
Threads: 20
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Quote:My first guess would be this: On 5090, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives.
What exact setup are you running? Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
small models can still be useful
Posts: 51
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
Posts: 68
Threads: 3
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Gemma and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.