Posts: 51
Threads: 11
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Spent some time on this today and wanted to compare notes.
I'm comparing two approaches here: keep it simple on dual 3090, or squeeze more out of the stack and deal with the complexity.
Trying to avoid rebuilding the whole thing twice.
My use case is pretty ordinary: local chat, some document work, and occasional batch jobs.
Posts: 52
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
following this because I'm in the same boat.
Posts: 55
Threads: 7
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with FLUX and compare from there.
still benchmarking everything
Posts: 28
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Posts: 121
Threads: 15
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
same here on my side.
image models by night, local pipelines by day
Posts: 41
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Ran a quick check on my box. On GB200 with llama.cpp, I saw basically the same behavior.
curious and caffeinated
Posts: 22
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. The pattern around KV cache pressure has been pretty similar for me. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.