Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
simple router policy ideas: worth it?
#1
Thought I'd post a small recipe because a lot of threads ask similar things.

Just sharing a setup that ended up working reasonably well: Qwen, TensorRT-LLM, Threadripper box, with a lot of attention on tail latency.

Feel free to tear it apart if you see something dumb.

I care more about stability than squeezing the last possible tokens/sec out of it.

I expected the biggest difference to come from the model, but the stack around it mattered at least as much.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#2
My first guess would be this: If you're on SGLang, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
Reply
#3
A couple things I'd check first. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at continuous batching.
watching release notes so you don't have to
Reply
#4
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one.
Reply
#5
Can you fill in a bit more context? Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally?
Reply
#6
Quote:Can you fill in a bit more context? Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally?

I hit almost the same issue last night.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#7
worth checking the driver first.
Reply
#8
Tried to reproduce it just now. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly.
Reply
#9
Quote:Tried to reproduce it just now. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly.

Ran a quick check on my box. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)