Posts: 42
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here.
Short version: TensorRT-LLM behaved well for me, but only after I stopped ignoring quant drift.
Happy to post more details if anyone wants them.
For context, I'm not chasing leaderboard numbers. I mostly want the system to feel consistent day to day.
curious and caffeinated
Posts: 52
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd approach it in a boring order. On dual 3090, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Posts: 51
Threads: 6
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I get why that seems right, but on dual 3090 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet.
If you post your exact settings, people here can probably narrow it down pretty fast.
serving stack tinkerer
Posts: 42
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd start with the simpler stack.
curious and caffeinated
Posts: 142
Threads: 20
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
What worked for me was pretty simple. On A6000, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
small models can still be useful
Posts: 42
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
curious and caffeinated
Posts: 57
Threads: 8
Joined: Oct 2026
Reputation:
0
subscribed, curious where this lands.