Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Used A6000 worth it now: anyone testing this?
#1
This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread.

The more I work with local setups, the more it seems like tail latency decides everything downstream.

Curious whether that lines up with what other people are seeing.
Reply
#2
I don't think that's the whole story. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet.
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
Reply
#3
I hit almost the same issue last night.
small models can still be good
Reply
#4
that fixed it for me too.
Reply
#5
that fixed it for me too.
7900 XTX / ROCm / somehow still optimistic
Reply
#6
Can you fill in a bit more context? Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
Reply
#7
Quote:Can you fill in a bit more context? Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?

A couple questions before I guess too hard. Are you testing this on 7900 XTX or something else?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)