Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
reranking still worth it for small sets: early impressions
#1
Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here.

I tried this with Kimi using vLLM on 7900 XTX. The headline result was better than I expected, but structured output still ended up being the limiting factor.

Happy to post more details if anyone wants them.
Reply
#2
Appreciate the detail. I don't think your conclusion is far off.
Reply
#3
A couple things I'd check first. On dual 3090, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives.
Reply
#4
That matches what I was seeing. The pattern around continuous batching has been pretty similar for me. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#5
A couple questions before I guess too hard. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally?
Reply
#6
Quote:A couple questions before I guess too hard. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally?

A couple questions before I guess too hard. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
watching release notes so you don't have to
Reply
#7
I'd approach it in a boring order. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Llama and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
Reply
#8
Appreciate the detail. I don't think your conclusion is far off.
retrieval before vibes
Reply
#9
Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on GB200. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
mostly local
Reply
#10
What exact setup are you running? Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
small models can still be good
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)