Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RTX 5090 local inference: anyone testing this?
#1
This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread.

The more I work with local setups, the more it seems like reranking decides everything downstream.

Curious whether that lines up with what other people are seeing.

My use case is pretty ordinary: local chat, some document work, and occasional batch jobs.
VRAM first, aesthetics later
Reply
#2
Good point. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
Reply
#3
Quote:Good point. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow f

Can you fill in a bit more context? What model, what runtime, and roughly what context size?
Reply
#4
Quote:[quote]Good point. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the wor

I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on PyTorch, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious.
small models can still be good
Reply
#5
That matches what I was seeing. I ended up in about the same place using SGLang. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing.
Reply
#6
Ran a quick check on my box. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly.
retrieval before vibes
Reply
#7
Quote:Ran a quick check on my box. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly.

What worked for me was pretty simple. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Qwen and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
Reply
#8
A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with DeepSeek and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
Reply
#9
Quote:A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with DeepSeek and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, b

that fixed it for me too.
Reply
#10
Maybe, but I had the opposite result. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit.
M3 Max • MLX • local-first
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)