10-18-2026, 09:23 PM
Quote:subscribed, curious where this lands.
A couple questions before I guess too hard. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
still benchmarking everything
|
prefill bottlenecks on longer prompts on A6000
|
|
10-18-2026, 09:23 PM
Quote:subscribed, curious where this lands. A couple questions before I guess too hard. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
still benchmarking everything
10-18-2026, 11:41 PM
Thanks, that helps. That matches what I saw on B200. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
10-19-2026, 12:04 AM
Did a small comparison this afternoon. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher.
10-19-2026, 03:51 AM
This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread.
One thing I keep noticing is that people underestimate speculative decoding until they actually try to run this stuff for more than one afternoon. Wondering if this is just where the whole space is heading now. For context, I'm not chasing leaderboard numbers. I mostly want the system to feel consistent day to day.
rack in the garage • local models everywhere
10-19-2026, 05:23 AM
My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Mixtral and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
small models can still be useful
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|