Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
industry move that matters for local users
#1
Spent some time on this today and wanted to compare notes.

I'm comparing two approaches here: keep it simple on M3 Max, or squeeze more out of the stack and deal with the complexity.

What would you pick if you had to live with it for a few months? At this point the real bottleneck is my patience.
learning in public
Reply
#2
I don't think that's the whole story. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#3
worth checking the driver first.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#4
Quote:worth checking the driver first.

same here on my side.

I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#5
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using vLLM.
watching release notes so you don't have to
Reply
#6
I'd start with the simpler stack.
curious and caffeinated
Reply
#7
Thanks, that helps. I ended up in about the same place using LM Studio. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
Reply
#8
Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on mini PC.
watching release notes so you don't have to
Reply
#9
Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal.
Reply
#10
My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with DeepSeek and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)