Posts: 128
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread.
The more I work with local setups, the more it seems like prefix caching decides everything downstream.
Curious whether that lines up with what other people are seeing.
rack in the garage • local models everywhere
Posts: 48
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd approach it in a boring order. On GB200, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives.
retrieval before vibes
Posts: 62
Threads: 6
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Appreciate the detail. I ended up in about the same place using SGLang.
Posts: 48
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. That matches what I saw on A6000.
retrieval before vibes
Posts: 67
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2026
Reputation:
0
Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.
curious and caffeinated
Posts: 65
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
A couple things I'd check first. If you're on LM Studio, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious.
Posts: 48
Threads: 7
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
I'd start with the simpler stack.
retrieval before vibes
Posts: 128
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on 5090. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
rack in the garage • local models everywhere
Posts: 65
Threads: 5
Joined: Sep 2026
Reputation:
0
Good point. The pattern around tail latency has been pretty similar for me.