Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
QLoRA resource reality check with SGLang
#1
I'm trying to sanity-check my setup.

My current setup is SGLang with A6000, and I keep running into long context.

If you've tested something similar, what did you keep and what did you stop bothering with?
watching release notes so you don't have to
Reply
#2
What worked for me was pretty simple. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Gemma and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.

I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#3
My first guess would be this: On mini PC, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time.
trying not to rebuild again
Reply
#4
What worked for me was pretty simple. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at HBM constraints. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.
throughput matters, but tail latency matters too
Reply
#5
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off.
post logs or it didn't happen
Reply
#6
Quote:Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off.

Can you fill in a bit more context? Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt?
Reply
#7
Quote:
Quote:Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off.

Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)