10-05-2026, 01:02 AM
Appreciate the detail. I ended up in about the same place using Ollama. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
|
speculative decoding in llama.cpp: anyone testing this?
|
|
10-05-2026, 01:02 AM
Appreciate the detail. I ended up in about the same place using Ollama. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable.
10-08-2026, 01:11 AM
I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on llama.cpp, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.
2x3090 • llama.cpp • too much VRAM is still not enough
10-08-2026, 01:43 AM
Interesting, I hadn't tried that. The pattern around MoE serving has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer.
10-08-2026, 04:10 AM
Quote:Interesting, I hadn't tried that. The pattern around MoE serving has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack i That matches what I was seeing. The pattern around tail latency has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|