do small edge boxes make sense with llama.cpp

[edgekite]

That matches what I was seeing. The pattern around structured output has been pretty similar for me.

[thetanest]

I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on LM Studio, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious.

[visionyard23]

Ran a quick check on my box. On GB200 with LM Studio, I saw basically the same behavior. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did.

[batchfield55]

Did a small comparison this afternoon. On 7900 XTX with TensorRT-LLM, I saw basically the same behavior. I expected the model choice to matter more th

What worked for me was pretty simple. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Gemma and compare from there. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.

[cobaltworks25]

[quote]Did a small comparison this afternoon. On 7900 XTX with TensorRT-LLM, I saw basically the same behavior. I expected the model choice to matter

My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Gemma and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.

[embershed99]

I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on Ollama, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it.