![]() |
|
context stuffing mistakes for Gemma - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Prompting & Context Engineering (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Forum: Long Context / Memory (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=64) +--- Thread: context stuffing mistakes for Gemma (/showthread.php?tid=80) |
context stuffing mistakes for Gemma - mellowsupply - 08-30-2026 Spent some time on this today and wanted to compare notes. I'm comparing two approaches here: keep it simple on 5090, or squeeze more out of the stack and deal with the complexity. What would you pick if you had to live with it for a few months? Re: context stuffing mistakes for Gemma - sanescope - 09-01-2026 Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: context stuffing mistakes for Gemma - emberquill - 09-01-2026 Quote:Thanks, that helps. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the wo I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at reranking. |