![]() |
|
throughput per watt reality check with Ollama - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Other Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=39) +--- Thread: throughput per watt reality check with Ollama (/showthread.php?tid=573) |
throughput per watt reality check with Ollama - macropilot - 09-30-2026 Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time. If you were starting from scratch today for this use case, what would you choose first and what would you ignore? Simple and boring is a valid answer. Re: throughput per watt reality check with Ollama - griffinloom66 - 09-30-2026 My first guess would be this: If you're on SGLang, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. Re: throughput per watt reality check with Ollama - deltapoint17 - 09-30-2026 I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I've seen people blame quant drift when the real issue was much more mundane. |