![]() |
|
throughput per watt reality check: worth it? - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Other Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=39) +--- Thread: throughput per watt reality check: worth it? (/showthread.php?tid=518) |
throughput per watt reality check: worth it? - cacheplane98 - 09-26-2026 Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here. I tried this with Phi using MLX on A6000. The headline result was better than I expected, but NVFP4 still ended up being the limiting factor. Nothing scientific here, just practical notes from a real setup. Re: throughput per watt reality check: worth it? - routecraft - 09-26-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on A6000. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. |