![]() |
|
clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Embedding / Reranking Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=53) +--- Thread: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX (/showthread.php?tid=314) |
clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - rocmpath - 09-17-2026 This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread. It feels like the conversation has shifted hard toward inference and serving details lately, and honestly that makes sense once you start dealing with tokens/sec. Maybe obvious to some of you, but it clicked for me this week. Re: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - quietsupply11 - 09-18-2026 Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on M3 Max. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point. Re: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - visionforge - 09-18-2026 Good point. That matches what I saw on mini PC. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - latentgarden - 09-19-2026 that fixed it for me too. Re: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - northcraft90 - 09-19-2026 Ran a quick check on my box. On 7900 XTX with PyTorch, I saw basically the same behavior. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. Re: clean API wrappers for local agents for FLUX - cozywire - 09-22-2026 That matches what I was seeing. I ended up in about the same place using MLX. |