![]() |
|
desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Apps / Utilities / Tools (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Forum: Local (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=20) +--- Thread: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp (/showthread.php?tid=1319) Pages:
1
2
|
desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - vramstream - 10-17-2026 Spent some time on this today and wanted to compare notes. I'm comparing two approaches here: keep it simple on M3 Max, or squeeze more out of the stack and deal with the complexity. What would you pick if you had to live with it for a few months? Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - torchshed66 - 10-17-2026 I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - mlxgarden - 10-17-2026 Not sure I agree there. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - vectorport - 10-17-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using PyTorch. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - batchshed - 10-17-2026 Need a little more detail here. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally? Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - mlxgarden - 10-18-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on mini PC. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - mintstation99 - 10-18-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at quant drift. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it. I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - modgarden - 10-18-2026 Quote:I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at quant drift. A lot of th I'd approach it in a boring order. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Llama and compare from there. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - audionode8 - 10-18-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off. Re: desktop apps around local AI with llama.cpp - rocmhouse90 - 10-18-2026 Quote:[quote]I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at quant drift. A lo Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. If you post your exact settings, people here can probably narrow it down pretty fast. |