![]() |
|
Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: RAG & Knowledge Systems (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Vector Databases (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=60) +--- Thread: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 (/showthread.php?tid=1260) |
Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - southspark - 10-16-2026 Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here. Short version: Ollama behaved well for me, but only after I stopped ignoring embeddings. Happy to post more details if anyone wants them. Re: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - macronest - 10-16-2026 A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Mistral and compare from there. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it. Re: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - cudaworks - 10-17-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. On A6000, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. Re: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - routecraft - 10-17-2026 Quote:What worked for me was pretty simple. On A6000, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Onc A couple things I'd check first. On 4090, the easiest win is often to back off the aggressive settings and see whether the problem survives. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. Re: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - deltagrid - 10-17-2026 Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on mini PC. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: Vector Databases discussion on GB200 - macronest - 10-17-2026 Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on B200. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. |