![]() |
|
DeepSeek V4.1 impressions - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Harnesses, Agents & Orchestration (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: Workflows / Automation (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=47) +--- Thread: DeepSeek V4.1 impressions (/showthread.php?tid=1175) |
DeepSeek V4.1 impressions - llmarch83 - 10-13-2026 Did a bit of testing and thought I'd post the result here. I tried this with Phi using llama.cpp on mini PC. The headline result was better than I expected, but INT4 still ended up being the limiting factor. Curious if anyone else landed in the same place. Re: DeepSeek V4.1 impressions - routecraft - 10-13-2026 I'd start with the simpler stack. Re: DeepSeek V4.1 impressions - routecraft - 10-14-2026 Quote:I'd start with the simpler stack. Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. |