![]() |
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants: anyone testing this? - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Hardware (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: GPUs (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +--- Thread: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants: anyone testing this? (/showthread.php?tid=1161) |
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants: anyone testing this? - nanobrook - 10-13-2026 Posting this in case it saves someone else a little time. I'm not trying to build a perfect architecture diagram. I just want a sane starting point around Ollama and M3 Max. Simple and boring is a valid answer. My use case is pretty ordinary: local chat, some document work, and occasional batch jobs. The logs were somehow calmer than I was. Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants: anyone testing this? - thetaember38 - 10-13-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Llama and compare from there. Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants: anyone testing this? - vrambandit - 10-14-2026 Did a small comparison this afternoon. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. |