![]() |
|
model fallback rules that work - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Open Weight (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +---- Forum: Recipes & Configurations (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: model fallback rules that work (/showthread.php?tid=968) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: model fallback rules that work - homelabhenry - 10-18-2026 Good point. I ended up in about the same place using SGLang. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: model fallback rules that work - phaseport36 - 10-18-2026 following this because I'm in the same boat. Re: model fallback rules that work - turboscope5 - 10-18-2026 Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on mini PC the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup. Re: model fallback rules that work - sparrowshed - 10-18-2026 Quote:Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on mini PC the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't gener I tested this tonight. On dual 3090 with TensorRT-LLM, I saw basically the same behavior. Re: model fallback rules that work - macropilot - 10-19-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on dual 3090. Re: model fallback rules that work - amberrunner - 10-19-2026 Quote:[quote]Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on mini PC the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn' Can you fill in a bit more context? Are you testing this on A6000 or something else? There are a few different conversations hiding inside this thread, so being explicit about the goal helps. |