![]() |
|
where reranking mattered for FLUX - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: RAG & Knowledge Systems (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: RAG (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Thread: where reranking mattered for FLUX (/showthread.php?tid=940) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: where reranking mattered for FLUX - turbogrid11 - 10-17-2026 Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on B200. Re: where reranking mattered for FLUX - homelabhenry - 10-18-2026 Good point. The pattern around embeddings has been pretty similar for me. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: where reranking mattered for FLUX - sparrowkite53 - 10-19-2026 Quote:Not sure I agree there. I've seen people blame tokens/sec when the real issue was much more mundane. I hit almost the same issue last night. Re: where reranking mattered for FLUX - quietsupply11 - 10-19-2026 Quote:Quote:Not sure I agree there. I've seen people blame tokens/sec when the real issue was much more mundane. Need a little more detail here. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt? Re: where reranking mattered for FLUX - routeforge64 - 10-19-2026 Not sure I agree there. I've seen people blame tokens/sec when the real issue was much more mundane. |