![]() |
|
prefix caching in llama.cpp with PyTorch - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: llama.cpp / GGUF (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +--- Thread: prefix caching in llama.cpp with PyTorch (/showthread.php?tid=839) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp with PyTorch - visionyard23 - 10-13-2026 I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I've seen people blame KV cache pressure when the real issue was much more mundane. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup. Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp with PyTorch - phasescope - 10-14-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at reranking. Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp with PyTorch - bytesupply76 - 10-14-2026 My first guess would be this: Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Kimi and compare from there. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. |