![]() |
|
speculative decoding in llama.cpp - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: llama.cpp / GGUF (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +--- Thread: speculative decoding in llama.cpp (/showthread.php?tid=834) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: speculative decoding in llama.cpp - macroforge - 10-11-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. If you're on vLLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point. Re: speculative decoding in llama.cpp - mangotinker73 - 10-12-2026 That matches what I was seeing. That matches what I saw on M3 Max. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. |