![]() |
|
batching changes after update for Llama - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Drivers / Frameworks / Toolkits (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: NVIDIA / CUDA (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +--- Thread: batching changes after update for Llama (/showthread.php?tid=816) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: batching changes after update for Llama - edgecoast - 10-18-2026 Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I've seen people blame router policy when the real issue was much more mundane. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet. I'm happy to test one more variant if you want a second data point. Re: batching changes after update for Llama - phaseport36 - 10-18-2026 I don't think that's the whole story. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. There are a few different conversations hiding inside this thread, so being explicit about the goal helps. I keep promising myself this is the last rebuild. Re: batching changes after update for Llama - kernelmike - 10-19-2026 subscribed, curious where this lands. Re: batching changes after update for Llama - llm_wren - 10-19-2026 Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I've seen people blame prefix caching when the real issue was much more mundane. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup. |