![]() |
|
best sandbox for trying risky tools: anyone testing this? - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Security, Privacy & Safety (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Forum: Sandboxing (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +--- Thread: best sandbox for trying risky tools: anyone testing this? (/showthread.php?tid=8) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: best sandbox for trying risky tools: anyone testing this? - embershed99 - 08-29-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. If you're on TensorRT-LLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it. Re: best sandbox for trying risky tools: anyone testing this? - llmtrack26 - 08-29-2026 I don't think that's the whole story. I get why that seems right, but on 5090 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Not saying you're wrong, just that I wouldn't lock that in as the lesson yet. Re: best sandbox for trying risky tools: anyone testing this? - bytesupply76 - 08-30-2026 same here on my side. |