![]() |
|
Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: RAG & Knowledge Systems (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Search / Retrieval / Reranking (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=61) +--- Thread: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion (/showthread.php?tid=683) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - mellowwire98 - 10-06-2026 Can you fill in a bit more context? Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally? Re: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - sparrowworks88 - 10-07-2026 Need a little more detail here. What model, what runtime, and roughly what context size? Re: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - cudacrate - 10-07-2026 Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I've seen people blame batch size when the real issue was much more mundane. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. Re: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - tensorport - 10-07-2026 Quote:Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I've seen people blame batch size when the real issue was much more mundane. Worth testing the simpler explanati Appreciate the detail. I don't think your conclusion is far off. Re: Search / Retrieval / Reranking discussion - southtinker - 10-07-2026 Ran a quick check on my box. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The surprise was that memory pressure showed up before throughput collapsed. |