Inference
image generation model locals actually use: what are you seeing? - Printable Version

+- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference)
+-- Forum: Evaluation & Testing (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Model Comparisons (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: image generation model locals actually use: what are you seeing? (/showthread.php?tid=477)

Pages: 1 2


Re: image generation model locals actually use: what are you seeing? - kernelgrid - 09-27-2026

Quote:[quote][quote]Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on 5090. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding

Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on mini PC the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Could be a workload difference, but I wouldn't generalize too fast from one setup.


Re: image generation model locals actually use: what are you seeing? - plainember52 - 09-27-2026

What worked for me was pretty simple. If you're on TensorRT-LLM, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece.


Re: image generation model locals actually use: what are you seeing? - stackpilot - 09-30-2026

I hit almost the same issue last night.